Search References

Akamatsu T (2023) A review of the effect of various type of artificial sounds to odontocetes. INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings 268:6496–6506. https://doi.org/10.3397/IN_2023_0959

Anderson RC (2014) Cetaceans and Tuna Fisheries in the Western and Central Indian Ocean. International Pole and Line Foundation, London

Barlow J, Cameron GA (2003) Field Experiments Show That Acoustic Pingers Reduce Marine Mammal Bycatch in the California Drift Gill Net Fishery. Marine Mammal Science 19:265–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2003.tb01108.x

Berggren P, Temple AJ, Alfaro-Shigueto J, et al (2020) Low-cost solutions to cetacean bycatch in global gillnet fisheries. In: IWC SC68. International Whaling Commission, Electronic Meeting, p 5

Berggren P, Temple A, Fennessy S, et al (2019) Bycatch Assessment and Mitigation in the Western Indian Ocean (BYCAM) - Final Project Update

Bisack KD, Das C (2015) Understanding Non-compliance With Protected Species Regulations in the Northeast USA Gillnet Fishery. Front Mar Sci 2:. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2015.00091

Bisack KD, Magnusson GM (2016) Measuring Management Success for Protected Species: Looking beyond Biological Outcomes. Front Mar Sci 3:. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2016.00061

Bordino P, Kraus S, Albareda D, et al (2002) Reducing Incidental Mortality of Franciscana Dolphin Pontoporia Blainvillei with Acoustic Warning Devices Attached to Fishing Nets. Marine Mammal Science 18:833–842. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2002.tb01076.x

Bowles AE, Anderson RC (2012) Behavioral Responses and Habituation of Pinnipeds and Small Cetaceans to Novel Objects and Simulated Fishing Gear With and Without a Pinger. Aquatic Mammals 38:161–188. https://doi.org/10.1578/AM.38.2.2012.161

Bruno CA, Caserta V, Salzeri P, et al (2021) Acoustic deterrent devices as mitigation tool to prevent dolphin-fishery interactions in the Aeolian Archipelago (Southern Tyrrhenian Sea, Italy). Mediterranean Marine Science 22:408–421. https://doi.org/10.12681/mms.23129

Bull L (2006) A review of methodologies aimed at avoiding and/or mitigating incidental catch of seabirds in longline fisheries. WCPFC-SC2-2006/EB WP-5, Brasilia, Brazil

Carlström J, Berggren P, Tregenza NJC (2009) Spatial and temporal impact of pingers on porpoises. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 66:72–82. https://doi.org/10.1139/F08-186

Carretta JV, Barlow J (2011) Long-Term Effectiveness, Failure Rates, and “Dinner Bell” Properties of Acoustic Pingers in a Gillnet Fishery. Marine Technology Society Journal 45:7–19. https://doi.org/10.4031/MTSJ.45.5.3

Carretta JV, Barlow J, Enriquez L (2008) Acoustic pingers eliminate beaked whale bycatch in a gill net fishery. Marine Mammal Science 24:956–961. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2008.00218.x

Carretta JV, Enriquez L (2010) Marine mammal and sea turtle bycatch in the California/Oregon swordfish and thresher shark drift gillnet fishery in 2009. Southwest Fisheries Science Center/ NOAA, La Jolla California USA

Choi K-S, Jo H-S, Kang M (2023) Investigation on bycatch reduction methods of marine mammals for fishing with gill net, trap, trawl, stow net and set net. J Korean Soc Fish Technol 59:279–289. https://doi.org/10.3796/KSFOT.2023.59.4.279

Clay T, Alfaro-Shigueto J, Godley B, et al (2019) Pingers reduce the activity of Burmeister’s porpoise around small-scale gillnet vessels. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 626:197–208. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps13063

Cox TM, Lewison RL, Zydelis R, et al (2007) Comparing Effectiveness of Experimental and Implemented Bycatch Reduction Measures: the Ideal and the Real. Conservation Biology 21:1155–1164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00772.x

Crosby A, Tregenza N, Williams R (2013) The Banana Pinger Trial: Investigation into the Fishtek Banana Pinger to reduce cetacean bycatch in an inshore set net fishery. The Wildlife Trusts, Cornwall., United Kingdom

Dawson S, Northridge S, Waples D, Read A (2013) To ping or not to ping: the use of active acoustic devices in mitigating interactions between small cetaceans and gillnet fisheries. Endang Species Res 19:201–221. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00464

FAO (2021) Fishing operations. Guidelines to prevent and reduce bycatch of marine mammals in capture fisheries. FAO, Rome, Italy

FAO (2020) Report of the Expert Meeting to Develop Technical Guidelines to Reduce Bycatch of Marine Mammals in Capture Fisheries. Rome, Italy, 17–19 September 2019. Fisheries and Aquaculture Report No. 1289. FAO, Rome, Italy

Gilman E, Brothers N, McPherson G, Dalzell P (2006) A review of cetacean interactions with longline gear. J Cetacean Res Manage 8:215–223

Goetz S, Read FL, Santos MB, et al (2014) Cetacean–fishery interactions in Galicia (NW Spain): results and management implications of a face-to-face interview survey of local fishers. ICES J Mar Sci 71:604–617. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fst149

Guidino C, Campbell E, Bielli A, et al (2022) Pingers Reduce Small Cetacean Bycatch in a Peruvian Small-Scale Driftnet Fishery, but Humpback Whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) Interactions Abound. Aquat Mamm 48:117–125. https://doi.org/10.1578/AM.48.2.2022.117