Search References

Moan A, Bjørge A (2023) Pingers reduce harbour porpoise bycatch in Norwegian gillnet fisheries, with little impact on day-to-day fishing operations. Fisheries Research 259:106564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2022.106564

Kratzer IMF, Brooks ME, Bilgin S, et al (2021) Using acoustically visible gillnets to reduce bycatch of a small cetacean: first pilot trials in a commercial fishery. Fisheries Research 243:106088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2021.106088

Dolman SJ, Evans PGH, Ritter F, et al (2021) Implications of new technical measures regulation for cetacean bycatch in European waters. Marine Policy 124:104320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104320

Popov DV, Meshkova GD, Hristova PD, et al (2020) Pingers as Cetacean Bycatch Mitigation Measure in Bulgarian Turbot Fishery. Acta Zool Bulg 15:235–242

Moan A, Skern-Mauritzen M, Vølstad JH, Bjørge A (2020) Assessing the impact of fisheries-related mortality of harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) caused by incidental bycatch in the dynamic Norwegian gillnet fisheries. ICES Journal of Marine Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsaa186

Omeyer LCM, Doherty PD, Dolman S, et al (2020) Assessing the Effects of Banana Pingers as a Bycatch Mitigation Device for Harbour Porpoises (Phocoena phocoena). Front Mar Sci 7:. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00285

Clay T, Alfaro-Shigueto J, Godley B, et al (2019) Pingers reduce the activity of Burmeister’s porpoise around small-scale gillnet vessels. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 626:197–208. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps13063

Kindt-Larsen L, Berg C, Tougaard J, et al (2016) Identification of high-risk areas for harbour porpoise Phocoena phocoena bycatch using remote electronic monitoring and satellite telemetry data. Marine Ecology Progress Series 555:261–271. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11806

Dolman S, Baulch S, Evans PGH, et al (2016) Towards an EU Action Plan on Cetacean Bycatch. Marine Policy 72:67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.06.020

Brown SL, Reid D, Rogan E (2015) Spatial and temporal assessment of potential risk to cetaceans from static fishing gears. Marine Policy 51:267–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2014.09.009

Goetz S, Read FL, Ferreira M, et al (2015) Cetacean occurrence, habitat preferences and potential for cetacean–fishery interactions in Iberian Atlantic waters: results from cooperative research involving local stakeholders. Aquatic Conserv: Mar Freshw Ecosyst 25:138–154. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2481

Senko J, White ER, Heppell SS, Gerber LR (2014) Comparing bycatch mitigation strategies for vulnerable marine megafauna. Anim Conserv 17:5–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12051

Dawson S, Northridge S, Waples D, Read A (2013) To ping or not to ping: the use of active acoustic devices in mitigating interactions between small cetaceans and gillnet fisheries. Endang Species Res 19:201–221. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00464

Mangel JC, Alfaro-Shigueto J, Van Waerebeek K, et al (2010) Small cetacean captures in Peruvian artisanal fisheries: High despite protective legislation. Biological Conservation 143:136–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.09.017

Carlström J, Berggren P, Tregenza NJC (2009) Spatial and temporal impact of pingers on porpoises. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 66:72–82. https://doi.org/10.1139/F08-186

Yousuf KSSM, Anoop AK, Anoop B, et al (2009) Observations on incidental catch of cetaceans in three landing centres along the Indian coast. Marine Biodiversity Records 2:. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175526720900075X

Carretta JV, Barlow J, Enriquez L (2008) Acoustic pingers eliminate beaked whale bycatch in a gill net fishery. Marine Mammal Science 24:956–961. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2008.00218.x

Cox TM, Lewison RL, Zydelis R, et al (2007) Comparing Effectiveness of Experimental and Implemented Bycatch Reduction Measures: the Ideal and the Real. Conservation Biology 21:1155–1164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00772.x

Mooney TA, Nachtigall PE, Au WWL (2004) Target Strength of a Nylon Monofilament and an Acoustically Enhanced Gillnet: Predictions of Biosonar Detection Ranges. aquatic mammals 30:220–226. https://doi.org/10.1578/AM.30.2.2004.220

Trippel EA, Holy NL, Palka DL, et al (2003) Nylon Barium Sulphate Gillnet Reduces Porpoise and Seabird Mortality. Marine Mammal Sci 19:240–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2003.tb01106.x

Jefferson TA, Curry BE (1994) A global review of porpoise (Cetacea: Phocoenidae) mortality in gillnets. Biological Conservation 67:167–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(94)90363-8