Search References

Year Citation Gear Species Technique/Category
2023
Moan A, Bjørge A (2023) Pingers reduce harbour porpoise bycatch in Norwegian gillnet fisheries, with little impact on day-to-day fishing operations. Fisheries Research 259:106564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2022.106564
GN Marine Mammals
Mitigation Techniques
2022
Guidino C, Campbell E, Bielli A, et al (2022) Pingers Reduce Small Cetacean Bycatch in a Peruvian Small-Scale Driftnet Fishery, but Humpback Whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) Interactions Abound. Aquat Mamm 48:117–125. https://doi.org/10.1578/AM.48.2.2022.117
GN Marine Mammals,
Sharks and Rays
Mitigation Techniques
Population Level Assessments
2021
Bruno CA, Caserta V, Salzeri P, et al (2021) Acoustic deterrent devices as mitigation tool to prevent dolphin-fishery interactions in the Aeolian Archipelago (Southern Tyrrhenian Sea, Italy). Mediterranean Marine Science 22:408–421. https://doi.org/10.12681/mms.23129
GN Marine Mammals
2020
Berggren P, Temple AJ, Alfaro-Shigueto J, et al (2020) Low-cost solutions to cetacean bycatch in global gillnet fisheries. In: IWC SC68. International Whaling Commission, Electronic Meeting, p 5
GN Marine Mammals
2020
Popov DV, Meshkova GD, Hristova PD, et al (2020) Pingers as Cetacean Bycatch Mitigation Measure in Bulgarian Turbot Fishery. Acta Zool Bulg 15:235–242
GN Marine Mammals
2020
Omeyer LCM, Doherty PD, Dolman S, et al (2020) Assessing the Effects of Banana Pingers as a Bycatch Mitigation Device for Harbour Porpoises (Phocoena phocoena). Front Mar Sci 7:. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00285
GN Marine Mammals
2019
Berggren P, Temple A, Fennessy S, et al (2019) Bycatch Assessment and Mitigation in the Western Indian Ocean (BYCAM) - Final Project Update
LL, GN Marine Mammals,
Sea Turtles,
Sharks and Rays
2019
Clay T, Alfaro-Shigueto J, Godley B, et al (2019) Pingers reduce the activity of Burmeister’s porpoise around small-scale gillnet vessels. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 626:197–208. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps13063
GN Marine Mammals
2016
Bisack KD, Magnusson GM (2016) Measuring Management Success for Protected Species: Looking beyond Biological Outcomes. Front Mar Sci 3:. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2016.00061
GN Marine Mammals
2015
Bisack KD, Das C (2015) Understanding Non-compliance With Protected Species Regulations in the Northeast USA Gillnet Fishery. Front Mar Sci 2:. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2015.00091
GN Marine Mammals,
Sea Turtles
Management Categories
2013
Crosby A, Tregenza N, Williams R (2013) The Banana Pinger Trial: Investigation into the Fishtek Banana Pinger to reduce cetacean bycatch in an inshore set net fishery. The Wildlife Trusts, Cornwall., United Kingdom
GN Marine Mammals
2013
Dawson S, Northridge S, Waples D, Read A (2013) To ping or not to ping: the use of active acoustic devices in mitigating interactions between small cetaceans and gillnet fisheries. Endang Species Res 19:201–221. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00464
GN Marine Mammals
2013
Mangel JC, Alfaro-Shigueto J, Witt MJ, et al (2013) Using pingers to reduce bycatch of small cetaceans in Peru’s small-scale driftnet fishery. Oryx 47:595–606. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605312000658
GN Marine Mammals,
Sharks and Rays
2012
Bowles AE, Anderson RC (2012) Behavioral Responses and Habituation of Pinnipeds and Small Cetaceans to Novel Objects and Simulated Fishing Gear With and Without a Pinger. Aquatic Mammals 38:161–188. https://doi.org/10.1578/AM.38.2.2012.161
GN Marine Mammals
2011
Carretta JV, Barlow J (2011) Long-Term Effectiveness, Failure Rates, and “Dinner Bell” Properties of Acoustic Pingers in a Gillnet Fishery. Marine Technology Society Journal 45:7–19. https://doi.org/10.4031/MTSJ.45.5.3
GN Marine Mammals
2009
Shapiro AD, Tougaard J, Jørgensen PB, et al (2009) Transmission loss patterns from acoustic harassment and deterrent devices do not always follow geometrical spreading predictions. Mar Mam Sci 25:53–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2008.00243.x
GN Marine Mammals
2009
Carlström J, Berggren P, Tregenza NJC (2009) Spatial and temporal impact of pingers on porpoises. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 66:72–82. https://doi.org/10.1139/F08-186
GN Marine Mammals
2008
Carretta JV, Barlow J, Enriquez L (2008) Acoustic pingers eliminate beaked whale bycatch in a gill net fishery. Marine Mammal Science 24:956–961. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2008.00218.x
GN Marine Mammals
2003
Barlow J, Cameron GA (2003) Field Experiments Show That Acoustic Pingers Reduce Marine Mammal Bycatch in the California Drift Gill Net Fishery. Marine Mammal Science 19:265–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2003.tb01108.x
GN Marine Mammals
2002
Bordino P, Kraus S, Albareda D, et al (2002) Reducing Incidental Mortality of Franciscana Dolphin Pontoporia Blainvillei with Acoustic Warning Devices Attached to Fishing Nets. Marine Mammal Science 18:833–842. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2002.tb01076.x
GN Marine Mammals
1999
Kraus S (1999) The once and future ping: Challenges for the use of acoustic deterrents in fisheries. MTS Journal 33:4
PS, GN Marine Mammals
1996
Jefferson TA, Curry BE (1996) Acoustic methods of reducing or eliminating marine mammal-fishery interactions: do they work? Ocean & Coastal Management 31:41–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0964-5691(95)00049-6
GN Marine Mammals
2022
Papageorgiou M, Hadjioannou L, Jimenez C, et al (2022) Understanding the Interactions Between Cetaceans and Other Megafauna With the Albacore Tuna Fishery: A Case Study From the Cyprus’ Pelagic Longline Fishery. Frontiers in Marine Science 9:
LL Marine Mammals,
Sharks and Rays
Management Categories
2021
FAO (2021) Fishing operations. Guidelines to prevent and reduce bycatch of marine mammals in capture fisheries. FAO, Rome, Italy
LL, PS, GN Marine Mammals
2013
Schakner ZA, Blumstein DT (2013) Behavioral biology of marine mammal deterrents: A review and prospectus. Biological Conservation 167:380–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.08.024
LL, PS Marine Mammals