Search References

Moan A, Bjørge A (2023) Pingers reduce harbour porpoise bycatch in Norwegian gillnet fisheries, with little impact on day-to-day fishing operations. Fisheries Research 259:106564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2022.106564

Guidino C, Campbell E, Bielli A, et al (2022) Pingers Reduce Small Cetacean Bycatch in a Peruvian Small-Scale Driftnet Fishery, but Humpback Whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) Interactions Abound. Aquat Mamm 48:117–125. https://doi.org/10.1578/AM.48.2.2022.117

McGarry T, De Silva R, Canning S, et al (2022) Evidence base for application of Acoustic Deterrent Devices (ADDs) as marine mammal mitigation (Version 4). JNCC Report No. 615, Peterborough, UK

Bruno CA, Caserta V, Salzeri P, et al (2021) Acoustic deterrent devices as mitigation tool to prevent dolphin-fishery interactions in the Aeolian Archipelago (Southern Tyrrhenian Sea, Italy). Mediterranean Marine Science 22:408–421. https://doi.org/10.12681/mms.23129

Berggren P, Temple AJ, Alfaro-Shigueto J, et al (2020) Low-cost solutions to cetacean bycatch in global gillnet fisheries. In: IWC SC68. International Whaling Commission, Electronic Meeting, p 5

Popov DV, Meshkova GD, Hristova PD, et al (2020) Pingers as Cetacean Bycatch Mitigation Measure in Bulgarian Turbot Fishery. Acta Zool Bulg 15:235–242

Omeyer LCM, Doherty PD, Dolman S, et al (2020) Assessing the Effects of Banana Pingers as a Bycatch Mitigation Device for Harbour Porpoises (Phocoena phocoena). Front Mar Sci 7:. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00285

Berggren P, Temple A, Fennessy S, et al (2019) Bycatch Assessment and Mitigation in the Western Indian Ocean (BYCAM) - Final Project Update

Clay T, Alfaro-Shigueto J, Godley B, et al (2019) Pingers reduce the activity of Burmeister’s porpoise around small-scale gillnet vessels. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 626:197–208. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps13063

Bisack KD, Magnusson GM (2016) Measuring Management Success for Protected Species: Looking beyond Biological Outcomes. Front Mar Sci 3:. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2016.00061

Bisack KD, Das C (2015) Understanding Non-compliance With Protected Species Regulations in the Northeast USA Gillnet Fishery. Front Mar Sci 2:. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2015.00091

Dawson S, Northridge S, Waples D, Read A (2013) To ping or not to ping: the use of active acoustic devices in mitigating interactions between small cetaceans and gillnet fisheries. Endang Species Res 19:201–221. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00464

Mangel JC, Alfaro-Shigueto J, Witt MJ, et al (2013) Using pingers to reduce bycatch of small cetaceans in Peru’s small-scale driftnet fishery. Oryx 47:595–606. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605312000658

Crosby A, Tregenza N, Williams R (2013) The Banana Pinger Trial: Investigation into the Fishtek Banana Pinger to reduce cetacean bycatch in an inshore set net fishery. The Wildlife Trusts, Cornwall., United Kingdom

Bowles AE, Anderson RC (2012) Behavioral Responses and Habituation of Pinnipeds and Small Cetaceans to Novel Objects and Simulated Fishing Gear With and Without a Pinger. Aquatic Mammals 38:161–188. https://doi.org/10.1578/AM.38.2.2012.161

Carretta JV, Barlow J (2011) Long-Term Effectiveness, Failure Rates, and “Dinner Bell” Properties of Acoustic Pingers in a Gillnet Fishery. Marine Technology Society Journal 45:7–19. https://doi.org/10.4031/MTSJ.45.5.3

Shapiro AD, Tougaard J, Jørgensen PB, et al (2009) Transmission loss patterns from acoustic harassment and deterrent devices do not always follow geometrical spreading predictions. Mar Mam Sci 25:53–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2008.00243.x

Carlström J, Berggren P, Tregenza NJC (2009) Spatial and temporal impact of pingers on porpoises. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 66:72–82. https://doi.org/10.1139/F08-186

Carretta JV, Barlow J, Enriquez L (2008) Acoustic pingers eliminate beaked whale bycatch in a gill net fishery. Marine Mammal Science 24:956–961. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2008.00218.x

Barlow J, Cameron GA (2003) Field Experiments Show That Acoustic Pingers Reduce Marine Mammal Bycatch in the California Drift Gill Net Fishery. Marine Mammal Science 19:265–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2003.tb01108.x

Bordino P, Kraus S, Albareda D, et al (2002) Reducing Incidental Mortality of Franciscana Dolphin Pontoporia Blainvillei with Acoustic Warning Devices Attached to Fishing Nets. Marine Mammal Science 18:833–842. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2002.tb01076.x

Kraus S (1999) The once and future ping: Challenges for the use of acoustic deterrents in fisheries. MTS Journal 33:4

Jefferson TA, Curry BE (1996) Acoustic methods of reducing or eliminating marine mammal-fishery interactions: do they work? Ocean & Coastal Management 31:41–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0964-5691(95)00049-6

Papageorgiou M, Hadjioannou L, Jimenez C, et al (2022) Understanding the Interactions Between Cetaceans and Other Megafauna With the Albacore Tuna Fishery: A Case Study From the Cyprus’ Pelagic Longline Fishery. Frontiers in Marine Science 9:

FAO (2021) Fishing operations. Guidelines to prevent and reduce bycatch of marine mammals in capture fisheries. FAO, Rome, Italy