Search References

Gilman E, Evans T, Pollard I, Chaloupka M (2023) Night-time and deep setting provides an economically viable solution to seabird bycatch in an albacore tuna longline fishery. In: ACAP - 11th Meeting of the Seabird Bycatch Working Group. SBWG11 Doc 10, Edinburgh, UK

Gilman E, Evans T, Pollard I, Chaloupka M (2023) Adjusting time-of-day and depth of fishing provides an economically viable solution to seabird bycatch in an albacore tuna longline fishery. Sci Rep 13:2621. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29616-7

Gilman E, De Ramón Castejón V, Loganimoce E, Chaloupka M (2020) Capability of a pilot fisheries electronic monitoring system to meet scientific and compliance monitoring objectives. Marine Policy 113:103792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103792

Gilman E, Chaloupka M, Sieben C (2021) Ecological risks of a data-limited fishery using an ensemble of approaches. Marine Policy 133:104752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104752

Gilman EL, Schneiter E, Brown C, et al (2018) Precision of Data from Alternative Fisheries Monitoring Sources: Comparison of Fisheries-dependent Data Derived from Electronic Monitoring, Logbook and Port Sampling Programs from Pelagic Longline Vessels Fishing in the Palau EEZM_effects_2018R1.pdf. TNC Indo-Pacific Tuna Program

Gilman E (2023) Fisheries Circular/February 2023: Benchmarking intergovernmental organizations’ development of minimum standards for fisheries electronic monitoring systems. In: ACAP - 11th Meeting of the Seabird Bycatch Working Group. SBWG11 Inf 23, Edinburgh, UK

Gerner M (2015) Cost effective monitoring in Australia’s tuna longline fisheries

Forum Fisheries Agency, WWF (2017) Role of Camera Systems and Electronic Monitoring in the Western Central Pacific Fisheries

Forget F, Muir J, Hutchinson M, et al (2021) Quantifying the accuracy of shark bycatch estimations in tuna purse seine fisheries. Ocean & Coastal Management 210:105637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105637

Fitzgerald S, Wallace F, Magrane K, et al (2019) Improving seabird species identification in electronic monitoring applications using machine learning systems. In: ACAP - Ninth Meeting of the Seabird Bycatch Working Group. ACAP SBWG9 Inf 21, Florianópolis, Brazil

Fitzgerald SM, Wallace F, Kim MA (2017) Recent U.S. experience with electronic monitoring, seabird monitoring, and incorporation into standard management protocols. In: ACAP - Eighth Meeting of the Seabird Bycatch Working Group. SBWG8-Doc-INF24, Wellington, New Zealand

Emery T, Noriega R, Parsa M, et al (2023) An evaluation of the reliability of electronic monitoring and logbook data for informing fisheries science and management: Gillnet Hook and Trap Sector. ABARES Technical Report (prepared for AFMA). https://doi.org/10.25814/FQ7R-9D17

Emery TJ, Noriega R, Williams AJ, et al (2018) The use of electronic monitoring within tuna longline fisheries in the WCPO - implications for international data collection, analysis and reporting. In: Third E-Reporting and E-Monitoring Working Group Meeting. WCPFC-2018-ERandEMWG3-IP04, Busan, Republic of Korea, p 38

Emery TJ, Noriega R, Williams AJ, Larcombe J (2019) Measuring congruence between electronic monitoring and logbook data in Australian Commonwealth longline and gillnet fisheries. Ocean & Coastal Management 168:307–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.11.003

Dunn S, Knuckey IA (2014) Potential for E-Reporting and E-Monitoring in the WCPFC.pdf. WCPFC, Majuro, Republic of the Marshall Islands

Dunn DC, Jablonicky C, Crespo GO, et al (2017) Empowering high seas governance with satellite vessel tracking data. Fish and Fisheries 19:729–739. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12285

Dept Fisheries & Aquatic Resources (2021) Pilot Project on Electronic Monitoring System (EMS) for small fishing vessels (24m>) operating in Sri Lanka (2018-2021). In: IOTC - Ad Hoc Working Group on the Development of Electronic Monitoring Programme Standards. IOTC-2021-WGEMS01-05_Rev1, Online

Denit K, Ellgen S, Fitzgerald SM, et al (2016) Electronic monitoring in fisheries of the United States. In: ACAP - Seventh Meeting of the Seabird Bycatch Working Group. ACAP, Serena, Chile, p ACAP-SBWG7-Inf19

de Bruyn P, Kell LT, Cotter J (2013) The ICCAT Meta-database: current status, future developments and dissemination. Collect Vol Sci Pap ICCAT 69:1876–1885

Course G, Pierre JP, Howell BK (2020) What’s in the Net? Using camera technology to monitor, and support mitigation of, wildlife bycatch in fisheries. Published by WWF. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.27592.14088

Coelho R (2022) ICCAT Electronic Monitoring System subgroup progress. In: IATTC - 3rd Workshop of an Electronic Monitoring System (EMS) in the EPO. Online

CCSBT (2022) 2022 - Multi-year Seabird Strategy

Carnes MJ, Stahl JP, Bigelow KA (2019) Evaluation of electronic monitoring pre-implementation in the Hawaiʻi-based longline fisheries. NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-PIFSC-90 38. https://doi.org/10.25923/82gg-jq77

Brown CJ, Desbiens A, Campbell MD, et al (2021) Electronic monitoring for improved accountability in western Pacific tuna longline fisheries. Marine Policy 132:104664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104664

Briand K, Bonnieux A, Le Dantec W, et al (2017) Comparing electronic monitoring system with observer data for estimating non-target species and discards on French tropical tuna purse seine vessels. In: IOTC - 13th Working Party on Ecosystems and Bycatch. IOTC-2017-WPEB13-17, San Sebastián, Spain