Search References

Barlow J, Cameron GA (2003) Field Experiments Show That Acoustic Pingers Reduce Marine Mammal Bycatch in the California Drift Gill Net Fishery. Marine Mammal Science 19:265–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2003.tb01108.x

Berggren P, Temple AJ, Alfaro-Shigueto J, et al (2020) Low-cost solutions to cetacean bycatch in global gillnet fisheries. In: IWC SC68. International Whaling Commission, Electronic Meeting, p 5

Berggren P, Temple A, Fennessy S, et al (2019) Bycatch Assessment and Mitigation in the Western Indian Ocean (BYCAM) - Final Project Update

Bisack KD, Das C (2015) Understanding Non-compliance With Protected Species Regulations in the Northeast USA Gillnet Fishery. Front Mar Sci 2:. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2015.00091

Bisack KD, Magnusson GM (2016) Measuring Management Success for Protected Species: Looking beyond Biological Outcomes. Front Mar Sci 3:. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2016.00061

Bowles AE, Anderson RC (2012) Behavioral Responses and Habituation of Pinnipeds and Small Cetaceans to Novel Objects and Simulated Fishing Gear With and Without a Pinger. Aquatic Mammals 38:161–188. https://doi.org/10.1578/AM.38.2.2012.161

Carretta JV, Barlow J (2011) Long-Term Effectiveness, Failure Rates, and “Dinner Bell” Properties of Acoustic Pingers in a Gillnet Fishery. Marine Technology Society Journal 45:7–19. https://doi.org/10.4031/MTSJ.45.5.3

Carretta JV, Barlow J, Enriquez L (2008) Acoustic pingers eliminate beaked whale bycatch in a gill net fishery. Marine Mammal Science 24:956–961. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2008.00218.x

Dawson S, Northridge S, Waples D, Read A (2013) To ping or not to ping: the use of active acoustic devices in mitigating interactions between small cetaceans and gillnet fisheries. Endang Species Res 19:201–221. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00464

Dawson SM (1991) Modifying Gillnets to Reduce Entanglement of Cetaceans. Marine Mammal Science 7:274–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.1991.tb00102.x

Jefferson TA, Curry BE (1996) Acoustic methods of reducing or eliminating marine mammal-fishery interactions: do they work? Ocean & Coastal Management 31:41–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0964-5691(95)00049-6

Kratzer IMF, Schäfer I, Stoltenberg A, et al (2020) Determination of Optimal Acoustic Passive Reflectors to Reduce Bycatch of Odontocetes in Gillnets. Front Mar Sci 7:. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00539

López BD, Mariño F (2011) A trial of acoustic harassment device efficacy on free-ranging bottlenose dolphins in Sardinia, Italy. Mar Freshwater Beh and Phys 44:197–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/10236244.2011.618216

Mangel JC, Alfaro-Shigueto J, Witt MJ, et al (2013) Using pingers to reduce bycatch of small cetaceans in Peru’s small-scale driftnet fishery. Oryx 47:595–606. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605312000658

Moan A, Skern-Mauritzen M, Vølstad JH, Bjørge A (2020) Assessing the impact of fisheries-related mortality of harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) caused by incidental bycatch in the dynamic Norwegian gillnet fisheries. ICES Journal of Marine Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsaa186

Mooney TA, Pacini AF, Nachtigall PE (2009) False killer whale (Pseudorca crassidens) echolocation and acoustic disruption: implications for longline bycatch and depredation. Can J Zoo 87:726–733. https://doi.org/10.1139/Z09-061

Mooney TA, Nachtigall PE, Au WWL (2004) Target Strength of a Nylon Monofilament and an Acoustically Enhanced Gillnet: Predictions of Biosonar Detection Ranges. aquatic mammals 30:220–226. https://doi.org/10.1578/AM.30.2.2004.220

Myrberg Jr AA, Banner A, Richard JD (1969) Shark attraction using a video-acoustic system. Marine Biology 2:264–276

Pfleger P (2016) Trying to save sea turtles through sound — NewsWorks. In: Newsworks.org. http://www.newsworks.org/index.php/local/the-pulse/92912-trying-to-save-sea-turtles-through-sound-. Accessed 4 May 2016

Piniak WED (2012) Acoustic Ecology of Sea Turtles: Implications for Conservation. PhD, Duke University

Popov DV, Meshkova GD, Hristova PD, et al (2020) Pingers as Cetacean Bycatch Mitigation Measure in Bulgarian Turbot Fishery. Acta Zool Bulg 15:235–242

Richard G, Samaran F, Guinet C, Bonnel J (2021) Settings of demersal longlines reveal acoustic cues that can inform toothed whales where and when to depredate. JASA Express Letters 1:016004. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0003191

Shapiro AD, Tougaard J, Jørgensen PB, et al (2009) Transmission loss patterns from acoustic harassment and deterrent devices do not always follow geometrical spreading predictions. Mar Mam Sci 25:53–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2008.00243.x

Tixier P, Gasco N, Duhamel G, Guinet C (2015) Habituation to an acoustic harassment device (AHD) by killer whales depredating demersal longlines. ICES J Mar Sci 72:1673–1681. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsu166

Trippel EA, Holy NL, Palka DL, et al (2003) Nylon Barium Sulphate Gillnet Reduces Porpoise and Seabird Mortality. Marine Mammal Sci 19:240–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2003.tb01106.x