Search References

Barlow J, Cameron GA (2003) Field Experiments Show That Acoustic Pingers Reduce Marine Mammal Bycatch in the California Drift Gill Net Fishery. Marine Mammal Science 19:265–283. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-7692.2003.tb01108.x

Berggren P, Temple A, Fennessy S, et al (2019) Bycatch Assessment and Mitigation in the Western Indian Ocean (BYCAM) - Final Project Update

Bisack KD, Das C (2015) Understanding Non-compliance With Protected Species Regulations in the Northeast USA Gillnet Fishery. Front Mar Sci 2:. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2015.00091

Bisack KD, Magnusson GM (2016) Measuring Management Success for Protected Species: Looking beyond Biological Outcomes. Front Mar Sci 3:. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2016.00061

Bowles AE, Anderson RC (2012) Behavioral Responses and Habituation of Pinnipeds and Small Cetaceans to Novel Objects and Simulated Fishing Gear With and Without a Pinger. Aquatic Mammals 38:161–188. doi: 10.1578/AM.38.2.2012.161

Carretta JV, Barlow J (2011) Long-Term Effectiveness, Failure Rates, and “Dinner Bell” Properties of Acoustic Pingers in a Gillnet Fishery. Marine Technology Society Journal 45:7–19. doi: 10.4031/MTSJ.45.5.3

Carretta JV, Barlow J, Enriquez L (2008) Acoustic pingers eliminate beaked whale bycatch in a gill net fishery. Marine Mammal Science 24:956–961. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-7692.2008.00218.x

Clay T, Alfaro-Shigueto J, Godley B, et al (2019) Pingers reduce the activity of Burmeister’s porpoise around small-scale gillnet vessels. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 626:197–208. doi: 10.3354/meps13063

Dawson S, Northridge S, Waples D, Read A (2013) To ping or not to ping: the use of active acoustic devices in mitigating interactions between small cetaceans and gillnet fisheries. Endang Species Res 19:201–221. doi: 10.3354/esr00464

Dawson SM (1991) Modifying Gillnets to Reduce Entanglement of Cetaceans. Marine Mammal Science 7:274–282. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-7692.1991.tb00102.x

Jefferson TA, Curry BE (1996) Acoustic methods of reducing or eliminating marine mammal-fishery interactions: do they work? Ocean & Coastal Management 31:41–70. doi: 10.1016/0964-5691(95)00049-6

Kratzer IMF, Schäfer I, Stoltenberg A, et al (2020) Determination of Optimal Acoustic Passive Reflectors to Reduce Bycatch of Odontocetes in Gillnets. Front Mar Sci 7:. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00539

Kraus S (1999) The once and future ping: Challenges for the use of acoustic deterrents in fisheries. MTS Journal 33:4

López BD, Mariño F (2011) A trial of acoustic harassment device efficacy on free-ranging bottlenose dolphins in Sardinia, Italy. Mar Freshwater Beh and Phys 44:197–208. doi: 10.1080/10236244.2011.618216

Mangel JC, Alfaro-Shigueto J, Witt MJ, et al (2013) Using pingers to reduce bycatch of small cetaceans in Peru’s small-scale driftnet fishery. Oryx 47:595–606. doi: 10.1017/S0030605312000658

Mooney TA, Pacini AF, Nachtigall PE (2009) False killer whale (Pseudorca crassidens) echolocation and acoustic disruption: implications for longline bycatch and depredation. Can J Zoo 87:726–733. doi: 10.1139/Z09-061

Mooney TA, Nachtigall PE, Au WWL (2004) Target Strength of a Nylon Monofilament and an Acoustically Enhanced Gillnet: Predictions of Biosonar Detection Ranges. aquatic mammals 30:220–226. doi: 10.1578/AM.30.2.2004.220

Myrberg Jr AA, Banner A, Richard JD (1969) Shark attraction using a video-acoustic system. Marine Biology 2:264–276

Omeyer LCM, Doherty PD, Dolman S, et al (2020) Assessing the Effects of Banana Pingers as a Bycatch Mitigation Device for Harbour Porpoises (Phocoena phocoena). Front Mar Sci 7:. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2020.00285

Pfleger P (2016) Trying to save sea turtles through sound — NewsWorks. In: Newsworks.org. http://www.newsworks.org/index.php/local/the-pulse/92912-trying-to-save-sea-turtles-through-sound-. Accessed 4 May 2016

Piniak WED (2012) Acoustic Ecology of Sea Turtles: Implications for Conservation. PhD, Duke University

Shapiro AD, Tougaard J, Jørgensen PB, et al (2009) Transmission loss patterns from acoustic harassment and deterrent devices do not always follow geometrical spreading predictions. Mar Mam Sci 25:53–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-7692.2008.00243.x

Tixier P, Gasco N, Duhamel G, Guinet C (2015) Habituation to an acoustic harassment device (AHD) by killer whales depredating demersal longlines. ICES J Mar Sci 72:1673–1681. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsu166

Trippel EA, Holy NL, Palka DL, et al (2003) Nylon Barium Sulphate Gillnet Reduces Porpoise and Seabird Mortality. Marine Mammal Sci 19:240–243. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-7692.2003.tb01106.x

Waples DM, Thorne LH, Hodge LEW, et al (2013) A field test of acoustic deterrent devices used to reduce interactions between bottlenose dolphins and a coastal gillnet fishery. Biological Conservation 157:163–171. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.07.012