Search References

Fu W, Song Z, Wang T, et al (2022) Acoustic deterrence to facilitate the conservation of pantropical spotted dolphins (Stenella attenuata) in the Western Pacific Ocean. Front Mar Sci 9:1023860. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.1023860

Richard G, Samaran F, Guinet C, Bonnel J (2021) Settings of demersal longlines reveal acoustic cues that can inform toothed whales where and when to depredate. JASA Express Letters 1:016004. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0003191

Kratzer IMF, Brooks ME, Bilgin S, et al (2021) Using acoustically visible gillnets to reduce bycatch of a small cetacean: first pilot trials in a commercial fishery. Fisheries Research 243:106088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2021.106088

Kratzer IMF, Schäfer I, Stoltenberg A, et al (2020) Determination of Optimal Acoustic Passive Reflectors to Reduce Bycatch of Odontocetes in Gillnets. Front Mar Sci 7:. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00539

Moan A, Skern-Mauritzen M, Vølstad JH, Bjørge A (2020) Assessing the impact of fisheries-related mortality of harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) caused by incidental bycatch in the dynamic Norwegian gillnet fisheries. ICES Journal of Marine Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsaa186

Wild L, Thode A, Straley J, et al (2017) Field trials of an acoustic decoy to attract sperm whales away from commercial longline fishing vessels in western Gulf of Alaska. Fisheries Research 196:141–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2017.08.017

Tixier P, Gasco N, Duhamel G, Guinet C (2015) Habituation to an acoustic harassment device (AHD) by killer whales depredating demersal longlines. ICES J Mar Sci 72:1673–1681. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsu166

O’Connell V, Straley J, Liddle J, et al (2015) Testing a passive deterrent on longlines to reduce sperm whale depredation in the Gulf of Alaska. ICES J Mar Sci 72:1667–1672. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsv014

Waples DM, Thorne LH, Hodge LEW, et al (2013) A field test of acoustic deterrent devices used to reduce interactions between bottlenose dolphins and a coastal gillnet fishery. Biological Conservation 157:163–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.07.012

Piniak WED (2012) Acoustic Ecology of Sea Turtles: Implications for Conservation. PhD, Duke University

Mooney TA, Pacini AF, Nachtigall PE (2009) False killer whale (Pseudorca crassidens) echolocation and acoustic disruption: implications for longline bycatch and depredation. Can J Zoo 87:726–733. https://doi.org/10.1139/Z09-061

Mooney TA, Nachtigall PE, Au WWL (2004) Target Strength of a Nylon Monofilament and an Acoustically Enhanced Gillnet: Predictions of Biosonar Detection Ranges. aquatic mammals 30:220–226. https://doi.org/10.1578/AM.30.2.2004.220

Trippel EA, Holy NL, Palka DL, et al (2003) Nylon Barium Sulphate Gillnet Reduces Porpoise and Seabird Mortality. Marine Mammal Sci 19:240–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2003.tb01106.x

Dawson SM (1991) Modifying Gillnets to Reduce Entanglement of Cetaceans. Marine Mammal Science 7:274–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.1991.tb00102.x

Myrberg Jr AA, Banner A, Richard JD (1969) Shark attraction using a video-acoustic system. Marine Biology 2:264–276

Mitchell JD, Drymon JM, Vardon J, et al (2022) Shark depredation: future directions in research and management. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-022-09732-9

Bruno CA, Caserta V, Salzeri P, et al (2021) Acoustic deterrent devices as mitigation tool to prevent dolphin-fishery interactions in the Aeolian Archipelago (Southern Tyrrhenian Sea, Italy). Mediterranean Marine Science 22:408–421. https://doi.org/10.12681/mms.23129

Tulloch V, Grech A, Jonsen I, et al (2020) Cost-effective mitigation strategies to reduce bycatch threats to cetaceans identified using return-on-investment analysis. Conservation Biology 34:168–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13418

Popov DV, Meshkova GD, Hristova PD, et al (2020) Pingers as Cetacean Bycatch Mitigation Measure in Bulgarian Turbot Fishery. Acta Zool Bulg 15:235–242

Omeyer LCM, Doherty PD, Dolman S, et al (2020) Assessing the Effects of Banana Pingers as a Bycatch Mitigation Device for Harbour Porpoises (Phocoena phocoena). Front Mar Sci 7:. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00285

Berggren P, Temple AJ, Alfaro-Shigueto J, et al (2020) Low-cost solutions to cetacean bycatch in global gillnet fisheries. In: IWC SC68. International Whaling Commission, Electronic Meeting, p 5

Berggren P, Temple A, Fennessy S, et al (2019) Bycatch Assessment and Mitigation in the Western Indian Ocean (BYCAM) - Final Project Update

Clay T, Alfaro-Shigueto J, Godley B, et al (2019) Pingers reduce the activity of Burmeister’s porpoise around small-scale gillnet vessels. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 626:197–208. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps13063

Ryan LA, Chapuis L, Hemmi JM, et al (2018) Effects of auditory and visual stimuli on shark feeding behaviour: the disco effect. Mar Biol 165:11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-017-3256-0

Bayless AR, Oleson EM, Baumann-Pickering S, et al (2017) Acoustically monitoring the Hawai‘i longline fishery for interactions with false killer whales. Fisheries Research 190:122–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2017.02.006