Search References

Pott C, Wiedenfeld DA (2017) Information gaps limit our understanding of seabird bycatch in global fisheries. Biological Conservation 210, Part A:192–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.04.002

Post S, Merkel F, Olesen M, et al (2024) Test of light emitting diodes (LED) as a possible bycatch mitigation measure in a gillnet fishery. Global Ecology and Conservation 52:e02976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e02976

Post S, Merkel F, Bak-Jensen Z, et al (2023) Bycatch mitigation in the West Greenland lumpfish (Cyclopterus lumpus) fishery using modified gillnets. Royal Society Open Science 10:221536. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.221536

Popov DV, Meshkova GD, Hristova PD, et al (2020) Pingers as Cetacean Bycatch Mitigation Measure in Bulgarian Turbot Fishery. Acta Zool Bulg 15:235–242

Pons M, Watson J, Ovando D, et al (2022) Trade-offs between bycatch and target catches in static versus dynamic fishery closures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119:11–11. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2114508119

Pons M, Melnychuk MC, Hilborn R (2018) Management effectiveness of large pelagic fisheries in the high seas. Fish and Fisheries 19:260–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12253

Polanowski A, MacDonald AJ, Barrington JH, et al (2023) Development of DNA markers to resolve uncertainties of seabird bycatch using feathers collected from dead seabirds (INFO paper; differs from WP). In: ACAP - 11th Meeting of the Seabird Bycatch Working Group. ACAP SBWG11 Inf 09, Edinburgh, UK

Polanowski A, Double M, MacDonald A, et al (2023) Development of DNA markers to resolve uncertainties of seabird bycatch using feathers collected from dead seabirds. In: ACAP - 11th Meeting of the Seabird Bycatch Working Group. SBWG11 Doc 12, Edinburgh, UK

Pol M, Maravelias CD (2023) Cracking the challenges of incentivizing avoidance of unwanted catch. ICES Journal of Marine Science fsad047. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsad047

Poisson F, Crespo FA, Ellis JR, et al (2016) Technical mitigation measures for sharks and rays in fisheries for tuna and tuna-like species: turning possibility into reality. Aquat Living Resour 29:402. https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2016030

Pinheiro WM, Santander-Neto J, Arthaud IDB, Faria VV (2023) Size and sex composition of three carcharhiniform sharks landed by a coastal artisanal fleet from the northeastern coast of Brazil. Neotrop ichthyol 21:e230005. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-2023-0005

Pilcher NJ, Antonopoulou MA, Rodriguez-Zarate CJ, et al (2021) Wide-Scale Population Connectivity Revealed by Postnesting Migrations of Green Sea Turtles from Ras Al Hadd, Oman. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 20:10–17. https://doi.org/10.2744/CCB-1462.1

Pierre J, Clough P, Debski I (2021) Making money and saving seabirds: An exploratory economic analysis of seabird bycatch reduction. In: ACAP - Tenth Meeting of the Seabird Bycatch Working Group. ACAP SBWG10 Inf 15, Electronic Meeting, p 2

Pierre J (2018) Using electronic monitoring imagery to characterise protected species interactions with commercial fisheries: A primer and review. Conservation Services Programme Project INT2017-02

Phillips B, Potts J, Rigby C, et al (2021) Applying rapid risk assessment methods to bycatch in the WCPO. In: WCPFC Scientific Committee 17th Regular Session. WCPFC-SC17-2021/SC17-EB-IP-10, Electronic Meeting

Philippe JS, Ciccione S, Bourjea J, et al (2014) Plan national d’actions en faveur des tortues marines des territoires francais de l’ocean Indien/2015-2020. Ministere de l’Ecologie, du Developpement durable et de l’Energie, La Reunion, France

Pew Trusts (2021) Key elements for designing an Electronic Monitoring Program. In: IATTC - 1st Meeting of Workshop on an Electronic Monitoring System (EMS). IATTC - EMS-Info Pew, Electronic Meeting

Pew Trusts (2021) 5 Key Elements for Designing an Electronic Monitoring Program. In: IOTC - Ad Hoc Working Group on the Development of Electronic Monitoring Programme Standards. IOTC-2021-WGEMS01-07, Online

Petersson MT (2022) Transparency in global fisheries governance: The role of non-governmental organizations. Marine Policy 136:104128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104128

Perrin WF, Donovan GP, Barlow J, International Whaling Commission (eds) (1994) Gillnets and cetaceans: incorporating the proceedings of the symposium and workshop on the mortality of cetaceans in passive fishing nets and traps. International Whaling Commission, Cambridge

Pearmain EJ, Dias M, Weimerskirch H, Karine D (2021) 3rd Meeting of the Stock and Ecological Risks Assessment (SERAWG3) - A framework for mapping the distribution of seabirds by integrating tracking, demography and phenology. SIOFA SERAWG-03-07

Patton PT, Cheeseman T, Abe K, et al (2023) A deep learning approach to photo–identification demonstrates high performance on two dozen cetacean species. Methods in Ecology and Evolution early view:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.14167

Pate JH, Wilmott JR, Jones C, et al (2023) Multiple datasets confirm range extension of the sicklefin devil ray Mobula tarapacana in the western North Atlantic Ocean off the eastern USA. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 103:e30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002531542300022X

Parton KJ, Galloway TS, Godley BJ (2019) Global review of shark and ray entanglement in anthropogenic marine debris. Endangered Species Research 39:173–190. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00964

Parker G, Molloy J (2017) Stocktake of measures for mitigating the incidental capture of seabirds in New Zealand commercial fisheries. In: ACAP - Eighth Meeting of the Seabird Bycatch Working Group. SBWG8-Doc-INF20, Wellington, New Zealand